Saturday, September 19, 2015

Sathya Sai orgn. trustees forcefully criticized DUAL LOYALTY among any office bearers in Singapore; Wonderful!

Given below are contents of my Facebook post, https://www.facebook.com/ravi.s.iyer.7/posts/1664944943722076:

SSSCT trustees Sri V. Srinivasan and Sri Naganand vocally, openly and forcefully criticized DUAL LOYALTY (Muddenahalli group related) among any office bearers in Singapore; Wonderful!

[SSSCT stands for Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust, the top official Sathya Sai orgn. body.]

Some extracts from Sri Vr Ganti​'s recent note, "V Srinivasan, Naganand & Satyajit Salian - Visit to Singapore - A Great Initiative", https://www.facebook.com/notes/vr-ganti/v-srinivasan-naganand-satyajit-salian-visit-to-singapore-a-great-initiative/10205211929762472:

The main message carried out by them [Ravi: SSSCT trustees] was that Sai Devotees could go anywhere, worship anybody and participate in any activity of any other religious or spiritual organization  (including Muddenhalli) and donate as much money they wish to,  so long as they are not office bearers in the Sai Organization.  In other words, officer bearers of Sai Centres in Singapore and its affiliates are prohibited from joining Mhalli Group and participate in its activities not only in Mhalli but also anywhere else.  This implies that those who are wanting to continue to support Mhalli Group and its activities should forthwith quit their positions in Sai (Organizations) and cannot continue to be office bearers of any of the Sai Centres.  I would think that this is just not a clarification but some sort of an order for Zone 4 and Singapore authorities to take note for implementation.
...
Sri Naganand was equally vocal in his views on Mhalli breakaway faction and was highlighting how Mhalli Group not only mislead, misrepresented and misguided various aspects. He made a mention not only on how Mhalli Group illegally amended the Trust Deed of Sri Sathya Sai Loka Seva Trust but also about the construction and ownership of Sai Ananadam, a notable construction at Mhalli campus. At that stage Sri V Srinivasan clarified that the expenditure on construction of Sai Anandam was accounted in the books of accounts of SSSCT which is verifiable.
...
..the question is - how will this guideline from apex body of SAI be implemented if the local authorities do not have any inclination to abide by that guideline and direction.  So one can surely say that The Trustees of SSSCT who have visited Singapore (and who are now on their way to Japan) have done what was expected of them.  It is now for others to follow up and take necessary action in the matter.  Surely SWAMI will be happy with the initiative SSSCT has taken up and for setting the ball in motion.
--- end extracts ----

Ravi: Wonderful! The trustees of SSSCT seem to have done their job very well. Now it is upto Zone 4 and Singapore authorities to follow the instructions of the trustees, WITH COURAGE. It is OK if even a lot of people leave and set up a separate Sukshma Baba orgn. That will solve the horrible DUAL LOYALTY and associated CONFLICT OF INTEREST problem. And if any top Singapore office bearers quit and create a new Sukshma Baba orgn. - good again. Let such people invest their energies for service of mankind, without any falsehood, by being part of a separate orgn.

I convey my thanks and gratitude to trustees Sri V. Srinivasan and Sri Naganand for so clearly stating SSSCT stand openly and forcefully. As Mr. Ganti has said, they have done their job (their duty to Kali Yuga Avatar, Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba). Now it is upto Zone 4 and Singapore orgn. top office bearers to COURAGEOUSLY take firm steps to remove any DUAL LOYALTY and CONFLICT OF INTEREST persons holding office bearer positions in Singapore (official) Sai organization.

I would also like to say to any brothers and sisters of Singapore Sai devotee fraternity believing in so called Muddenahalli subtle body, who happen to read this post (or associated mail), that I have great appreciation for the social work done by Muddenahalli group. If they really strongly believe in Muddenahalli group it is best to form a separate orgn. in Singapore and focus whole heartedly and OPENLY on that. Sri Indulal Shah sir, Sri B. N. Narasimhamurthy sir, Mr. Isaac Tigrett and Sri C. Srinivas are OPEN about their belief and their loyalty towards Muddenahalli based orgn. Why don't Singapore Sai devotees who believe in Muddenahalli so called subtle body also become OPEN believers like them and help create a new Sukshma Baba orgn. in Singapore? Muddenahalli group already has developed a strong base with alumni of Alike and Muddenahalli schools being strong supporters.

I think it is INEVITABLE that broadly we will have three Sai groups now, worldwide: Shirdi Sai group, Sathya Sai group and Muddenahalli Sukshma Sai group. The court case (or even any future such court case) can impact only certain property and, at the most, IMHO, restrict so called communicator from using the name of Sri Sathya Sai Baba as the form that he claims to see and communicate with. Moving from one property location to another is no big deal for spiritual movements. Even Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba moved from old mandir to new mandir/ashram in Puttaparthi. And so called communicator stating that he is now saying words of Sukshma Sai Baba (instead of using name of Sri Sathya Sai Baba) will also not be that big a deal (if it comes to that). So why be afraid of forming a new Sukshma Baba orgn. in Singapore if you strongly believe in so called Muddenahalli subtle body? By forming a separate Saraswathi trust (based in Muddenahalli) that is what the Muddenahalli group leaders, Sri Narasimhamurty, Sri Indulal Shah and others have done.

And just in case, somebody (like Madhusudhan Naidu, so called communicator) told you that at 90th birthday time, all of Puttaparthi ashram system will accept claims of Muddenahalli so called subtle body and so called communicator, let me tell you that that is so highly IMPROBABLE, that I would say that it is VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

Jai Sairam!

No comments:

Post a Comment