SSSCT should publicly state that any Sai orgn. staff can OPENLY CONDEMN so called communicator Madhusudhan Rao Naidu
In a Facebook note of Sri. V.R. Ganti, https://www.facebook.com/notes/vr-ganti/many-sai-devotees-are-voicing-david-wolff-speaks-on-muddenahalli-fraud/10205431348687808, which is on the recent message from Sai brother, Sri David Wolff, of North Carolina, USA, Sri Ganti writes:
SWAMI had clarified many times that HIS students are His property. When I was distressed about inaction from various authorities in the Sai (Organization) against Mhalli and its activities, I have prayed to SWAMI and I got a message from Him – I quote – NA SOTHHU VADUKO (USE MY PROPERTY). Accordingly, I have written / spoken with so many Sai Students (especially Alumni) to come forward and express their views openly as it could have tremendous impact. Many have indeed responded giving excuses such as –
a) SWAMI knows everything and will take such action as is necessary in HIS time frame;
b) I am not interested into getting into these kinds of activities of condemning and would only like to continue with my Sadhana;
c) What to do Sir, I am working in the organization and so we cannot openly condemn and / or write without the permission of the concerned authorities; and
d) Some other excuse or other for not opening up though they are fully convinced of the atrocities committed at Mhalli.
Having said the above, in my personal opinion, slowly and steadily many from the Alumni are opening up and one such person is Sri Ranganatha Raju and I am sure many would (be forthcoming) sooner than later.
--- end extract from Mr. Ganti Facebook note ---
Ravi: I would like to give my view on point c) of the above which refers to Sai university alumni, including senior faculty of Sai university (Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, SSSIHL), who are working in (official) Sai institutions and organizations as paid staff. Based on my stint in the Sai university, Prasanthi Nilayam campus as a FREE SERVICE staff (designations of Honorary Staff, Honorary Faculty & Visiting Faculty) from Jan. 2003 to Mar. 2012, I think the point is genuine to some extent at least. My view is that those Sai alumni who are now staff in Sai orgns/institutions who have publicly spoken about this matter like Sri Satyajit Salian, Sri Vedanarayan and some staff from Radio Sai, would have discussed the matter with their orgn. heads and would have been given the go-ahead prior to them making public statements on the matter.
To solve the c) problem for those alumni who are staying SILENT on their own Sai alumnus brother Madhusudhan Naidu's MAD claims about being a so called communicator of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba and giving darshan, interviews and discourses in Bhagavan's HOLY NAME, which has led to such confusion in the Sai university in the past (till Nov. 2014 when its former VC who is a Muddenahalli believer, stepped down from the post) and in Sai orgn. in countries like Singapore which is facing a SERIOUS DIVISIVE CRISIS over the matter, one of the solutions is that they (alumni-staff) approach their orgn. heads seeking permission to make public statements on it (e.g. the video message I have suggested that senior Sai university faculty make on this matter). In today's scenario where Muddenahalli group competitively held a Yagnam during recent Dassara function while Prasanthi Nilayam was holding the Veda Purusha yagnam, I am quite sure that no Sai orgn./institution head will refuse permission for such statements.
To make things even clearer, I think the esteemed trustees of the Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust (SSSCT), which is the mother organization of all Sai institutions managed from Prasanthi Nilayam, should put out a PUBLIC STATEMENT that they will NOT take action against any staff who CONDEMN the so called communicator of Muddenahalli, Sai university alumnus, Shri Madhusudhan Rao Naidu's claims of speaking the words of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba and giving darshan, interviews and discourses in Bhagavan's HOLY NAME. If SSSCT does that then problem c) above will vanish for Sai university alumni-staff of Sai institutions/orgns.
SWAMI had clarified many times that HIS students are His property. When I was distressed about inaction from various authorities in the Sai (Organization) against Mhalli and its activities, I have prayed to SWAMI and I got a message from Him – I quote – NA SOTHHU VADUKO (USE MY PROPERTY). Accordingly, I have written / spoken with so many Sai Students (especially Alumni) to come forward and express their views openly as it could have tremendous impact. Many have indeed responded giving excuses such as –
a) SWAMI knows everything and will take such action as is necessary in HIS time frame;
b) I am not interested into getting into these kinds of activities of condemning and would only like to continue with my Sadhana;
c) What to do Sir, I am working in the organization and so we cannot openly condemn and / or write without the permission of the concerned authorities; and
d) Some other excuse or other for not opening up though they are fully convinced of the atrocities committed at Mhalli.
Having said the above, in my personal opinion, slowly and steadily many from the Alumni are opening up and one such person is Sri Ranganatha Raju and I am sure many would (be forthcoming) sooner than later.
--- end extract from Mr. Ganti Facebook note ---
Ravi: I would like to give my view on point c) of the above which refers to Sai university alumni, including senior faculty of Sai university (Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, SSSIHL), who are working in (official) Sai institutions and organizations as paid staff. Based on my stint in the Sai university, Prasanthi Nilayam campus as a FREE SERVICE staff (designations of Honorary Staff, Honorary Faculty & Visiting Faculty) from Jan. 2003 to Mar. 2012, I think the point is genuine to some extent at least. My view is that those Sai alumni who are now staff in Sai orgns/institutions who have publicly spoken about this matter like Sri Satyajit Salian, Sri Vedanarayan and some staff from Radio Sai, would have discussed the matter with their orgn. heads and would have been given the go-ahead prior to them making public statements on the matter.
To solve the c) problem for those alumni who are staying SILENT on their own Sai alumnus brother Madhusudhan Naidu's MAD claims about being a so called communicator of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba and giving darshan, interviews and discourses in Bhagavan's HOLY NAME, which has led to such confusion in the Sai university in the past (till Nov. 2014 when its former VC who is a Muddenahalli believer, stepped down from the post) and in Sai orgn. in countries like Singapore which is facing a SERIOUS DIVISIVE CRISIS over the matter, one of the solutions is that they (alumni-staff) approach their orgn. heads seeking permission to make public statements on it (e.g. the video message I have suggested that senior Sai university faculty make on this matter). In today's scenario where Muddenahalli group competitively held a Yagnam during recent Dassara function while Prasanthi Nilayam was holding the Veda Purusha yagnam, I am quite sure that no Sai orgn./institution head will refuse permission for such statements.
To make things even clearer, I think the esteemed trustees of the Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust (SSSCT), which is the mother organization of all Sai institutions managed from Prasanthi Nilayam, should put out a PUBLIC STATEMENT that they will NOT take action against any staff who CONDEMN the so called communicator of Muddenahalli, Sai university alumnus, Shri Madhusudhan Rao Naidu's claims of speaking the words of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba and giving darshan, interviews and discourses in Bhagavan's HOLY NAME. If SSSCT does that then problem c) above will vanish for Sai university alumni-staff of Sai institutions/orgns.
Comments
Post a Comment