Sri Narasimhamurthy is plain wrong in reported criticism of Prasanthi Nilayam devotees as doing pradakshina of samadhi thinking Swami is not in Muddenahalli
Comments I made on the Facebook post of Shubha Ramesh Kumar, 'Shirdi Baba said "My tomb shall bless and speak to the needs of my devotees" It is therefore only natural that we worship and throng the Samadhi of our beloved Sai Ma in Prashanti Nilayam', https://www.facebook.com/shubha.kumar/posts/10157957648230538 dated 15-Feb-2017, are given below:
This comment of mine presumes that sister Shubha's English translation of the audio she refers to is correct.
I think it is very rich for Sri Narasimhmamurthy (BNNM) who has DISOBEYED the instructions of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba with respect to mediums and communicators, and who is promoting the FALSE BELIEF in so called communicator Madhusudan Rao Naidu, to criticize people who worship the samadhi of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba at Prasanthi Nilayam. I don't think such devotees who worship the samadhi at Prasanthi Nilayam say that Bhagavan is not there in Muddenahalli. So BNNM is plain wrong there.
What many people of Prasanthi Nilayam say is that Madhusudan Rao Naidu's claim of being a so called communicator of Bhagavan goes against the public instructions and teachings of Bhagavan!!! Madhusudan Rao Naidu is not saying the words of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba!!!
Creation of many free schools and colleges and free medical service institutions cannot JUSTIFY promoting an imitator who may have some siddhi powers, as a communicator of Bhagavan. Neither can many such free service institutions be a proof of Madhusudan Rao Naidu's claims being true!!!
The International Red Cross, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Committee_of_the_Red_Cross, and Medicines Sans Frontieres, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A9decins_Sans_Fronti%C3%A8res, do extraordinary and much required medical relief work in many places worldwide. There surely must be Christian missionary educational institutions which are far bigger in their operations than what Muddenahalli group is doing. But they do not promote mediums and communicators of divine figures like Jesus Christ and use their vast institutional network to justify such medium and communicator claims!
For spiritual work, not only should the ends be good but the means also should be good. By using the not-good means of Madhusudan Rao Naidu FALSE CLAIM of being a communicator of Bhagavan, it is my considered view that Sri Narasimhamurthy and other leaders of Muddenhalli group have chosen a false belief and therefore fragile foundation for the spiritual movement they are creating. They are misguiding thousands of Sathya Sai devotees worldwide by endorsing and promoting this FALSE CLAIM of Madhusudan Rao Naidu.
Sathyam Vada Dharmam Chara is what Bhagavan told us to follow. How can using the Asathya & Adharma of Madhusudan Rao Naidu imitating some aspects of Bhagavan, and DISOBEYING the instructions of Bhagavan by claiming to be a medium/communicator of his, be viewed as following Bhagavan's teachings and instructions???
It is very sad to see a close and long-time servitor of Bhagavan, a former warden of Bhagavan's university, publicly endorse and promote such false belief. Jai Sairam!
----
[In response to a request to sister Shubha to take the "sickening" pics down, I wrote as follows (slightly edited):]
No --name-snipped--. The pics should stay up. I plan to share them shortly (from SaiBliss post). We have to inform and educate the Sathya Sai community about what these FALSE BELIEF purveyors are doing using the HOLY NAME of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.
----
[In response to comment of Ajith Padyana who is a former student of mine from Sai university, and so personally known to me, "What Shubha madam has written is absolutely nice translation from Kannada to English. Swami has to take care of these fools. No more respect to these frauds", I wrote as follows: ]
Thanks Ajith Padyana for backing up Shubha Ramesh Kumar's translation from Kannada to English. As I don't know Kannada I needed some confirmation of Shubha's words before I shared this post on my timeline, as the words are related to Sri Narasimhamurthy and are sensitive. Will share this post shortly.
----
This comment of mine presumes that sister Shubha's English translation of the audio she refers to is correct.
I think it is very rich for Sri Narasimhmamurthy (BNNM) who has DISOBEYED the instructions of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba with respect to mediums and communicators, and who is promoting the FALSE BELIEF in so called communicator Madhusudan Rao Naidu, to criticize people who worship the samadhi of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba at Prasanthi Nilayam. I don't think such devotees who worship the samadhi at Prasanthi Nilayam say that Bhagavan is not there in Muddenahalli. So BNNM is plain wrong there.
What many people of Prasanthi Nilayam say is that Madhusudan Rao Naidu's claim of being a so called communicator of Bhagavan goes against the public instructions and teachings of Bhagavan!!! Madhusudan Rao Naidu is not saying the words of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba!!!
Creation of many free schools and colleges and free medical service institutions cannot JUSTIFY promoting an imitator who may have some siddhi powers, as a communicator of Bhagavan. Neither can many such free service institutions be a proof of Madhusudan Rao Naidu's claims being true!!!
The International Red Cross, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Committee_of_the_Red_Cross, and Medicines Sans Frontieres, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A9decins_Sans_Fronti%C3%A8res, do extraordinary and much required medical relief work in many places worldwide. There surely must be Christian missionary educational institutions which are far bigger in their operations than what Muddenahalli group is doing. But they do not promote mediums and communicators of divine figures like Jesus Christ and use their vast institutional network to justify such medium and communicator claims!
For spiritual work, not only should the ends be good but the means also should be good. By using the not-good means of Madhusudan Rao Naidu FALSE CLAIM of being a communicator of Bhagavan, it is my considered view that Sri Narasimhamurthy and other leaders of Muddenhalli group have chosen a false belief and therefore fragile foundation for the spiritual movement they are creating. They are misguiding thousands of Sathya Sai devotees worldwide by endorsing and promoting this FALSE CLAIM of Madhusudan Rao Naidu.
Sathyam Vada Dharmam Chara is what Bhagavan told us to follow. How can using the Asathya & Adharma of Madhusudan Rao Naidu imitating some aspects of Bhagavan, and DISOBEYING the instructions of Bhagavan by claiming to be a medium/communicator of his, be viewed as following Bhagavan's teachings and instructions???
It is very sad to see a close and long-time servitor of Bhagavan, a former warden of Bhagavan's university, publicly endorse and promote such false belief. Jai Sairam!
----
[In response to a request to sister Shubha to take the "sickening" pics down, I wrote as follows (slightly edited):]
No --name-snipped--. The pics should stay up. I plan to share them shortly (from SaiBliss post). We have to inform and educate the Sathya Sai community about what these FALSE BELIEF purveyors are doing using the HOLY NAME of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.
----
[In response to comment of Ajith Padyana who is a former student of mine from Sai university, and so personally known to me, "What Shubha madam has written is absolutely nice translation from Kannada to English. Swami has to take care of these fools. No more respect to these frauds", I wrote as follows: ]
Thanks Ajith Padyana for backing up Shubha Ramesh Kumar's translation from Kannada to English. As I don't know Kannada I needed some confirmation of Shubha's words before I shared this post on my timeline, as the words are related to Sri Narasimhamurthy and are sensitive. Will share this post shortly.
----
Comments
Post a Comment